Yes, our software offers valuable insights into motor speech disorders, aiding in accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. The software is tailored as a tool that you can juxtapose with other findings. However, the final decision is upon you and you have to allways follow the whole recommended examination with regard to the hierarchy (please see Figure bellow):
Figure: Hierarchical representation of what a clinician should and can consider for the diagnosis of motor speech disorder. Note that the Dysarhria Analyzer is one the the tools providing interpretable acoustic analysis. Source: Hlavnička, J. (2019). Automated analysis of speech disorders in neurodegenerative diseases. Presentation material for the defence of the doctoral Thesis. Czech Technical University in Prague: Prague, Czech Republic.
Auzou, P., Ozsancak, C., Jan, M., Menard, J.F., Eustache, F., & Hannequin, D. (2000). Evaluation of motor speech function in the diagnosis of various forms of dysarthria. Revue Neurologique, 156, 47-52.
Fonville, S., Van Der Worp, H.B., Maat, P., Aldenhoven, M., Algra, A., & Van Gijn, J. (2008). Accuracy and inter-observer variation in the classification of dysarthria from speech recordings. Journal of Neurology, 255, 1545-1548.
Graaff, M., Kuiper, T., Zwinderman, A., Van de Warrenburg, B., Poels, P., Offeringa, A., Van der Kooi, A., Speelman, H., & De Visser, M. (2009). Clinical identification of dysarthria types among neurologists, residents in neurology and speech therapists. European Neurology, 61, 295-300.
Zyski, B.J., & Weisiger, B.E. (1987). Identification of dysarthria types based on perceptual analysis. Journal of Communication Disorders, 20, 367-378.